The extent was driven by the open book approach and the requirement to prove a true professional process hence why Keevan was chosen to do this document, he actually collated this document on a beach in Spain whilst on annual leave having the call asking to get it done that day due to client demand so he sat under in an umbrella sipping soft drinks whilst others were enjoying the sun.
(Sometimes you have to get things done and play catch up on real life afterwards/when finished)
This is an old version (2014/2015) shown due to updates being withheld from the market as we don't want everyone just copying, the idea is to make your own but with guildance.
Each member of the interview team has one of these documents and then post interview, all the individual scores are combined to produce an aggregated percentage score for each attending subcontractor.
All subcontractors should be given the same commercial documentation
to complete without which, it becomes difficult in establishing missed items and
alike with subcontractors tenders that some companies will use to appear best
value only to later increase their original cost plan sums based on stating
they never allowed for it which is why the tender information pack and the
returned clarification and assumptions require careful review, and should be returned in the same format to allow both ease of both levelling bids and plugging any gaps.
Post-Tender Subcontractor Questionnaire
This is an PCSA 1st Stage cost plan base-levelling format example, but limited content due to the fact that the sums were compiled from the cost-plan CSA shown on the left of this example, it’s a cost plan so examples of full project single stage tenders can be shown in addition but these are available upon request and reason, otherwise this webpage would too large to read through, and its intention is only to show processes and practises exist.